It is suggested that everyone in the world should have a car, a TV and a fridge. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
题目来源：2022年5月21日大陆雅思大作文（重复2010年4月24日大陆考题）
1
题目大意
有人建议天下上每个人都该当有用一辆汽车、一台冰箱和电视，你认为利弊如何？
2
思路解析
这是一道利弊类大作文，谈论的是每个人都拥有汽车、冰箱和电视的利弊。利弊类文章须要强调在论证上表示合理性，即在详细的剖析中，明确能表示出一边的论述的确是大于另一边，或是利弊均等，而利弊是否有说服力并不取决于不雅观点的数量，而是内容是否有说服力。题目理解上不难，下面月半鸭带大家来看下详细不雅观点。
首先来看好处，有两方面。
一是能够极大的改进人们的生活质量。电视机能够丰富人们的娱乐生活；冰箱让食材特殊是肉类和水产储存更久；汽车则能让人出行更加方便，不会受到景象或公共交通不敷的影响。每个人都会希望让自己的生活变得更好，因此让人们能拥有这些工具是利于个人的。
二是有利于经济发展。家电和汽车的需求增长会匆匆使厂家有动力进行生产以增加营收，过程中能够创造大量就业岗位。同时，消费者和商家的交易过程中也能为政府带来GDP和税收，进而使适合局有更多资金能够投入各个领域的培植和研究。
然后来看坏处，这里分别给出利大于弊（前者）和弊大于利（后者）两种思路下的弊端
大量的电器和汽车，会带来环境污染问题和能源花费问题。这些设备想要正常运作须要花费大量的煤炭和石油，这会加重能源包袱，同时燃油汽车也会排放废气，进而导致温室效应对环境造成毁坏。（但随着科技进步，更多清洁能源和科技的利用使得这个问题能够得到改进，比如太阳能发电和电动汽车。）
弊大于利的话须要扣在everyone上，如果每个人都拥有电视、冰箱和汽车，那将是一个非常巨大的数量。纵然能源和废气排放能够办理，但制造这些商品就须要投入巨额的质料，并且迭代过程中还会产生大量难以处理的废弃垃圾。同时，每个人都拥有汽车对付城市的道路系统也会是个巨大磨练，特殊是在大城市中，过多的私家车运行可能会遭严重的道路堵塞乃至瘫痪，乃至可能都没有足够空间用于停车。（以上海为例，目前私家车大约有350万辆，就已经足够造成道路拥堵了，如果按上海人口2400万人，每人一辆那便是目前数量的近7倍……）
3
提要
4
高分范文示例
It is universally accepted that everyone needs a car, a TV, and a fridge to make life more convenient. Though using these facilities may be advantageous for the general public, I personally believe that the potential harm outweighs the advantages.
It can be justified that possessing these facilities brings several benefits to everyday life. Firstly, they help raise people’s standards of living by making life more comfortable. Compared with the past decades when recreational activities were quite limited, the advent of television enriches people’s lives through providing them with greater entertainment. Meanwhile, travelling by private vehicle makes it possible for individuals to enjoy great freedom in planning routes, timing and destinations. In addition, refrigerators help preserve food stuffs so that people who are fully occupied can have easy access to leftovers as food can maintain its natural appearance and nutritive value in the fridge. Secondly, a growing demand for these possessions stimulates production and generates more income for the companies. In the long run, such consumption would further contribute to the national economy, through which governments would be able to accumulate significant tax revenues to subsidize projects that benefit the whole population.
However, a heavy dependence on vehicles and appliances may pose a threat to both the environment and the well-being of the general public. For one thing, having too many vehicles on the roads is likely to cause traffic congestion, and this would also be a major producer of toxic emissions that aggravate environmental pollution and harm people’s health. For another, the manufacturing of automobiles, refrigerators and televisions necessitates a significant amount of resources. Therefore, if every single individual has a demand for these facilities, it would result in massive energy consumption that may be beyond what the globe could offer. Moreover, although environmental concerns may be addressed through technological advancement, energy depletion is by no means reversible.
In conclusion, the possession of cars, TVs, and fridges could bring both benefits and drawbacks, but the negative impacts seem to be more impressive.
范文作者：张乔西
5
干系词汇和语法构造
Standard of living 生活水平
Recreational activities 娱乐活动
Tax revenue 税收收入
Toxic emissions 废气排放
Aggravate 加剧
